Location Summary

Supporting Documentation

 

Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN

   
  Overall Rankings 
 
   
  Metro Area (out of 45): 
        Healthy Housing: 6th   
        Prior Rank: 6th  
 
   
  Central City (out of 44): 
 
        Healthy Housing: 35th
 
        Prior Rank: 30th
 
   
   
  
 
   
  Data source: 2007 American Housing Survey
 
   

 
Location Summary

Positive Findings: Compared to the national average, Minneapolis-St. Paul had fewer homes with cracks in the walls, signs of rats, flush toilet breakdowns, room heaters without a flue, lack of adequate kitchen facilities, exposed wire, and rooms without an electrical outlet. Dwellings outside the central city were less likely to have room heaters without a flue and rooms without a working electrical outlet. Units outside the central city had fewer open cracks in walls, signs of rats, water supply stoppage, flush toilet breakdowns, lack of complete plumbing, room heaters without a flue, exposed wires in the unit, rooms without a working electrical outlet, and a lack of adequate kitchen facilities. Rental homes were less likely to have signs of rats, room heaters without a flue, rooms without a working electrical outlet, and a lack of adequate kitchen facilities. Owner-occupant homes were less likely to have signs of rats, water supply stoppage, flush toilet breakdowns, rooms heaters without a flue, exposed wire in the unit, and rooms without a working electrical outlet.

Areas for Improvement: Compared to the national average, the metro area was more likely to have signs of mice and roofing problems than the national average. Central city dwellings were more likely than the national average to have problems with holes in floors, broken plaster/peeling paint, water leaks from outside, water supply stoppage, lacking complete plumbing, and roofing, siding, window, and foundation problems. Areas outside the central city were higher than the national average for signs of mice. Owner-occupied units were more likely to have signs of mice and roofing, siding, and foundation problems.

Community Information: The Minneapolis-St. Paul MSA is comprised of Anoka, Carver, Chisago, Dakota, Hennepin, Isanti, Ramsey, Scott, Sherburne, Washington, and Wright counties, Minnesota, and  Pierce and St. Croix counties, Wisconsin. In 2007, the MSA included 1,229,900 occupied dwellings, 21.6% of which were located in the central cities of Minneapolis-St. Paul. The housing stock of the MSA ranked among the youngest of the cities surveyed and average rental. The percentage of post-1940 homes ranked 26th (14.4%) for the MSA and 33rd (46.2%) for the central city. The median house age in the Minneapolis-St. Paul MSA was 1977. The percentage of rental units ranked 2nd (20.1%) for the MSA and 23rd (48.0%) for the central city. Compared to other locations, Minneapolis-St. Paul had a lower poverty rate. Its poverty rate ranked 1st (7.1%) for the entire MSA and 13th (14.8%) for the homes in the central city.


 

Minneapolis-Saint Paul, MN

MSACentral CityOutside Central City
MetricPercent W/ Problem Percent W/ Problem Percent W/ Problem

Basic Housing Quality
Severe physical problems
1.6%
4.1%
0.8%
Moderate physical problems
1.4%
3.3%
0.9%

Interior Problems
Holes in floors
1.0%
2.6%
0.6%
Open cracks or holes in walls
3.9%
7.4%
3.0%
Broken plaster/peeling paint
2.0%
5.4%
1.0%
Signs of rats
0.1%
0.5%
0.0%
Signs of mice
6.1%
7.4%
5.8%
Water leaks from inside
8.0%
11.2%
7.1%
Water leaks from outside
10.3%
13.6%
9.4%
Water supply stoppage
2.9%
5.3%
2.2%
Flush toilet breakdown
1.0%
2.5%
0.6%
Sewage disposal breakdown
1.2%
1.6%
1.1%
Lacking complete plumbing
1.0%
3.1%
0.4%
Heating equip breakdown
2.2%
2.6%
2.1%
Room heater without flue
0.4%
0.4%
0.3%
Exposed wiring in unit
0.5%
0.6%
0.4%
Rooms w/o working elect. outlet
0.5%
0.0%
0.6%
Lacking kitchen facilities
0.9%
2.8%
0.4%

Exterior Problems
Roofing problems
7.5%
13.1%
6.5%
Siding problems
3.5%
8.2%
2.7%
Window problems
4.0%
11.6%
2.7%
Foundation problems
3.0%
9.5%
1.9%

Any Identified Problem
Any Identified Problem
35.5%
56.1%
31.9%


MSARentalOwner Occupied
MetricPercent W/ Problem Percent W/ Problem Percent W/ Problem

Basic Housing Quality
Severe physical problems
1.6%
3.6%
0.8%
Moderate physical problems
1.4%
3.7%
0.6%

Interior Problems
Holes in floors
1.0%
1.9%
0.7%
Open cracks or holes in walls
3.9%
6.4%
3.1%
Broken plaster/peeling paint
2.0%
4.1%
1.3%
Signs of rats
0.1%
0.0%
0.2%
Signs of mice
6.1%
5.6%
6.3%
Water leaks from inside
8.0%
11.4%
6.8%
Water leaks from outside
10.3%
7.3%
11.3%
Water supply stoppage
2.9%
5.9%
1.8%
Flush toilet breakdown
1.0%
3.2%
0.2%
Sewage disposal breakdown
1.2%
1.1%
1.2%
Lacking complete plumbing
1.0%
2.5%
0.5%
Heating equip breakdown
2.2%
4.0%
1.6%
Room heater without flue
0.4%
0.5%
0.3%
Exposed wiring in unit
0.5%
0.6%
0.4%
Rooms w/o working elect. outlet
0.5%
0.5%
0.5%
Lacking kitchen facilities
0.9%
2.7%
0.2%

Exterior Problems
Roofing problems
7.5%
12.0%
7.0%
Siding problems
3.5%
4.5%
3.5%
Window problems
4.0%
8.8%
3.5%
Foundation problems
3.0%
5.5%
2.8%

Any Identified Problem
Any Identified Problem
35.5%
43.1%
34.8%
Legend:    Most Healthy  Most Unhealthy